New brain-computer interface allows man with ALS to ‘speak’ again (2024)

Neurological HealthAugust 14, 2024

By Nadine A Yehya

(SACRAMENTO)

A new brain-computer interface (BCI) developed at UC Davis Health translates brain signals into speech with up to 97% accuracy — the most accurate system of its kind.

The researchers implanted sensors in the brain of a man with severely impaired speech due to amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). The man was able to communicate his intended speech within minutes of activating the system.

A study about this work was published today in the New England Journal of Medicine.

New brain-computer interface allows man with ALS to ‘speak’ again (1)

ALS, also known as Lou Gehrig's disease, affects the nerve cells that control movement throughout the body. The disease leads to a gradual loss of the ability to stand, walk and use one’s hands. It can also cause a person to lose control of the muscles used to speak, leading to a loss of understandable speech.

The new technology is being developed to restore communication for people who can’t speak due to paralysis or neurological conditions like ALS. It can interpret brain signals when the user tries to speak and turns them into text that is ‘spoken’ aloud by the computer.

“Our BCI technology helped a man with paralysis to communicate with friends, families and caregivers,” said UC Davis neurosurgeon David Brandman. “Our paper demonstrates the most accurate speech neuroprosthesis (device) ever reported.”

Brandman is the co-principal investigator and co-senior author of this study. He is an assistant professor in the UC Davis Department of Neurological Surgery and co-director of the UC Davis Neuroprosthetics Lab.

The new BCI breaks the communication barrier

When someone tries to speak, the new BCI device transforms their brain activity into text on a computer screen. The computer can then read the text out loud.

To develop the system, the team enrolled Casey Harrell, a 45-year-old man with ALS, in the BrainGate clinical trial. At the time of his enrollment, Harrell had weakness in his arms and legs (tetraparesis). His speech was very hard to understand (dysarthria) and required others to help interpret for him.

In July 2023, Brandman implanted the investigational BCI device. He placed four microelectrode arrays into the left precentral gyrus, a brain region responsible for coordinating speech. The arrays are designed to record the brain activity from 256 cortical electrodes.

“We’re really detecting their attempt to move their muscles and talk,” explained neuroscientist Sergey Stavisky. Stavisky is an assistant professor in the Department of Neurological Surgery. He is the co-director of the UC Davis Neuroprosthetics Lab and co-principal investigator of the study. “We are recording from the part of the brain that’s trying to send these commands to the muscles. And we are basically listening into that, and we’re translating those patterns of brain activity into a phoneme — like a syllable or the unit of speech — and then the words they’re trying to say.”

New brain-computer interface allows man with ALS to ‘speak’ again (2)

Faster training, better results

Despite recent advances in BCI technology, efforts to enable communication have been slow and prone to errors. This is because the machine-learning programs that interpreted brain signals required a large amount of time and data to perform.

“Previous speech BCI systems had frequent word errors. This made it difficult for the user to be understood consistently and was a barrier to communication,” Brandman explained. “Our objective was to develop a system that empowered someone to be understood whenever they wanted to speak.”

Harrell used the system in both prompted and spontaneous conversational settings. In both cases, speech decoding happened in real time, with continuous system updates to keep it working accurately.

The decoded words were shown on a screen. Amazingly, they were read aloud in a voice that sounded like Harrell’s before he had ALS. The voice was composed using software trained with existing audio samples of his pre-ALS voice.

Watch Video

New Brain-Computer Interface Allows Man with ALS to 'Speak’ Again

At the first speech data training session, the system took 30 minutes to achieve 99.6% word accuracy with a 50-word vocabulary.

“The first time we tried the system, he cried with joy as the words he was trying to say correctly appeared on-screen. We all did,” Stavisky said.

In the second session, the size of the potential vocabulary increased to 125,000 words. With just an additional 1.4 hours of training data, the BCI achieved a 90.2% word accuracy with this greatly expanded vocabulary. After continued data collection, the BCI has maintained 97.5% accuracy.

New brain-computer interface allows man with ALS to ‘speak’ again (5)

The first time we tried the system, he cried with joy as the words he was trying to say correctly appeared on-screen. We all did.” neuroscientist Sergey Stavisky

“At this point, we can decode what Casey is trying to say correctly about 97% of the time, which is better than many commercially available smartphone applications that try to interpret a person’s voice,” Brandman said. “This technology is transformative because it provides hope for people who want to speak but can’t. I hope that technology like this speech BCI will help future patients speak with their family and friends.”

The study reports on 84 data collection sessions over 32 weeks. In total, Harrell used the speech BCI in self-paced conversations for over 248 hours to communicate in person and over video chat.

New brain-computer interface allows man with ALS to ‘speak’ again (6)

This technology is transformative because it provides hope for people who want to speak but can’t.” neurosurgeon David Brandman

“Not being able to communicate is so frustrating and demoralizing. It is like you are trapped,” Harrell said. “Something like this technology will help people back into life and society.”

“It has been immensely rewarding to see Casey regain his ability to speak with his family and friends through this technology,” said the study’s lead author, Nicholas Card. Card is a postdoctoral scholar in the UC Davis Department of Neurological Surgery.

New brain-computer interface allows man with ALS to ‘speak’ again (7)

Not being able to communicate is so frustrating and demoralizing. It is like you are trapped. Something like this technology will help people back into life and society.” Casey Harrell, patient with ALS and a participant in the BrainGate2 BCI trial

“Casey and our other BrainGate participants are truly extraordinary. They deserve tremendous credit for joining these early clinical trials. They do this not because they’re hoping to gain any personal benefit, but to help us develop a system that will restore communication and mobility for other people with paralysis,” said co-author and BrainGate trial sponsor-investigator Leigh Hochberg. Hochberg is a neurologist and neuroscientist at Massachusetts General Hospital, Brown University and the VA Providence Healthcare System.

Brandman is the site-responsible principal investigator of the BrainGate2 clinical trial. The trial is enrolling participants. To learn more about the study, visit braingate.org or contact braingate@ucdavis.edu.

A complete list of coauthors and funders is available in the article.

Caution: Investigational device. Limited by Federal law to investigational use.

Additional readings

  • Read the study
  • Neurological surgery researcher Sergey Stavisky and team awarded $3.5 million in grants
  • Clinical Trial Aims to Develop New Methods to Restore Speech with Brain-Computer Interface
  • Video
New brain-computer interface allows man with ALS to ‘speak’ again (2024)

FAQs

New brain-computer interface allows man with ALS to ‘speak’ again? ›

A new brain-computer interface (BCI) developed at UC Davis Health

UC Davis Health
Sacramento-based UC Davis Medical Center is a nationally renowned academic medical center where clinical practice, teaching and research converge to advance human health. A few highlights about the medical center: A 656-bed multispecialty academic medical center.
https://health.ucdavis.edu › about
translates brain signals into speech with up to 97% accuracy — the most accurate system of its kind. The researchers implanted sensors in the brain of a man with severely impaired speech due to amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS).

Is the brain computer interface real? ›

Brain-computer interfaces are devices that process brain activity and send signals to external software, allowing a user to control devices with their thoughts. With BCI technology, scientists envision a day when patients with paralysis, muscle atrophy and other conditions could regain motor functions.

How much does a brain computer interface cost? ›

Mindrove arc - EEG-based brain-computer interface at Rs 112000/piece | EEG Device in Ahmedabad | ID: 2849111242173.

What is the most advanced brain computer interface? ›

Neuralink's successful implant, part of the very early stages of the FDA approval process, marks a big step in the burgeoning field of brain-computer interfaces, or BCIs. It makes Neuralink the most advanced version of the most ambitious type of implant in which sensors actually contact the brain.

What is another name for the brain computer interface? ›

A brain–computer interface (BCI), sometimes called a brain–machine interface (BMI), is a direct communication link between the brain's electrical activity and an external device, most commonly a computer or robotic limb.

What are the side effects of brain computer interface? ›

The implantation of invasive BCI devices carries inherent medical risks like infection or brain tissue damage. Even non-invasive techniques may pose health concerns, such as the effects of long-term exposure to electromagnetic fields. BCIs have also be shown to lead to high cognitive fatigue.

How close are we to the brain computer interface? ›

Amid ongoing human clinical trials, there is still a long way to go before neural chips are commonplace in clinics. It will potentially still take just under a decade for BCIs to reach market, but clinical trials are advancing quickly.

How accurate is the brain computer interface? ›

An average accuracy of 86% for EEG and that of 75.6% for fNIRS were achieved using an LDA-based classifier. This study was tested for the control of a drone, whose results showed the feasibility of using prefrontal-based commands for BCI.

Is there a computer stronger than the human brain? ›

While today's most powerful supercomputer, Frontier, matches the Human Brain computing power, it consumes million times more energy! It is an apples to oranges comparison, as they process information differently. Nonetheless, the Human Brain processing power has been estimated at 1 exaflops, about the same as Frontier.

What are the problems with BCI? ›

Safety. Safety concerns can generally be observed in invasive BCI types. Because of being implanted into the brain tissue, invasive BCI can damage nerve cells and blood vessels, hence increasing the risk of infection.

Who owns Neuralink? ›

But because billionaire technologist Elon Musk owns Neuralink, the company has received outsize attention.

What a brain-computer interface attempts to do? ›

Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) acquire brain signals, analyze them, and translate them into commands that are relayed to output devices that carry out desired actions.

Who invented the brain-computer interface? ›

In the 1970s, the University of California Los Angeles professor Jacques Vidal coined the term brain-computer interface and demonstrated that people could mentally guide a cursor through a simple virtual maze.

Is it possible to connect your brain to a computer? ›

Its device uses electrocorticography-based BCI (ECoG). Electrodes in the form of metal discs are placed directly on the surface of the brain to receive signals. They connect wirelessly to a receiver, which in turn connects to a computer.

How accurate is the brain-computer interface? ›

An average accuracy of 86% for EEG and that of 75.6% for fNIRS were achieved using an LDA-based classifier. This study was tested for the control of a drone, whose results showed the feasibility of using prefrontal-based commands for BCI.

Is whole brain emulation possible? ›

The technology for mapping and simulating an entire human brain is not currently available, but it is possible. This means that whole brain emulation likely is not a question of “if” but “when.” Therefore, it is imperative to discuss the ethics and potential ramifications of the technology before it is developed.

Is the brain really like a computer? ›

One fundamental difference between the human brain and a computer lies in the brain's function as just one component of a larger biological system; it is influenced by and dependent on stimuli that the body encounters. A computer, on the other hand, is a standalone information processing system.

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Jamar Nader

Last Updated:

Views: 5855

Rating: 4.4 / 5 (75 voted)

Reviews: 90% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Jamar Nader

Birthday: 1995-02-28

Address: Apt. 536 6162 Reichel Greens, Port Zackaryside, CT 22682-9804

Phone: +9958384818317

Job: IT Representative

Hobby: Scrapbooking, Hiking, Hunting, Kite flying, Blacksmithing, Video gaming, Foraging

Introduction: My name is Jamar Nader, I am a fine, shiny, colorful, bright, nice, perfect, curious person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.